Review overview
Public site architecture prototype
This standalone low-fidelity section tests the proposed public Soundfangled website structure before visual design. Use it to review information architecture, content hierarchy, page purpose, user journeys and missing content.
Content note
This is not a visual design route. All boxes, media areas and page modules are deliberately plain placeholders.
Clickable sitemap
Review wrapper
- Overview and review checklist/prototype
- Sitemap view/prototype/sitemap
- UX Assumptions & Decisions/prototype/ux
Primary site pathways
- Home/prototype/home
- Production/prototype/production
- AV Systems & Installations/prototype/systems-installations
- Acoustics & Environmental Design/prototype/acoustics
- RUK/prototype/acoustics/ruk
- Hire Handoff/prototype/hire
- Contact/prototype/contact
Proof
- Case Studies/prototype/case-studies
- We Out Here/prototype/case-studies/we-out-here
- Alphabet Music Venue/prototype/case-studies/alphabet-music-venue
- Rotary Connection / Charles Stepney/prototype/case-studies/rotary-connection-charles-stepney
Publishing system
- Insights and technical guides/prototype/insights
- Secure audio protocols/prototype/insights/secure-audio-protocols
- How to stop hot mics/prototype/insights/how-to-stop-hot-mics
Client review questions
- Does the homepage explain Soundfangled clearly enough before routing into divisions?
- Are the main pathways right: Production, AV Systems & Installations, Acoustics, Hire?
- Should AV Systems & Installations be top-level, or folded into Acoustics?
- Does Production feel like the flagship current offer?
- Does Acoustics feel like a specialist design arm rather than a side service?
- Does Hire feel correctly deprioritised but still accessible?
- Are the case studies mapped to the right services?
- Are the SEO article templates suitable for regular publishing?
- Are the accordions being used in the right way?
- What content is missing before moving into visual design?